( 9 reviews )
-
Posted: Apr 23 2009
I've owned my Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III for about a year now, and while I felt some remorse at first after having spent almost $8000 to purchase it, I can now say that it was worth every penny. You can read the camera's specifications at Canon's Web site, so all I'll say here is that this camera is a joy to use and utterly reliable. I've never owned a finer piece of photographic equipment. That having been said, there is one thing about which you should be aware before purchasing this model: This camera's 21.1 megapixel sensor demands the finest lenses. Some of my old L-series zoom lenses (that worked well with my EOS-5D) are just not sharp enough to use on this camera. In other words, be prepared to spend even more money if you don't own the newest EF prime lenses.
-
Posted: Feb 24 2009
I owned this camera since spring of 2008, So at the point of writing this review, I used it for nearly a year. Now, if you are earlier owner, you might have experienced a problem or two. I was unfortunately one of the owner experienced problem, and had to ship it back to Canon for the warranty repair. So, I was not exactly happy about paying expensive FEDEX freight. But, rest assured, no other nasty problem occurred after warranty repair, and this camera has been workhorse of my photography. Now, let get on the review. This is really wonderful 21.1MP camera, and it is well worth the money. But, you have to determine if you need to use one. At the time of release, there were no other full size sensor camera with this resolutions. Of course, it has been since passed by other manufacture... but I will not going to that comparison. For Professional User. Important thing about this camera is economics. I own EOS 5D as well, and when non-commissioned or low paid project, I tend to bring 5D instead of 1DS MK3. It is due to the fact, overall operational cost tend to be higher on the 1DS MK3 so if does not paid well, there will be no point to bring it out. But, if it does paid well. there are enough justification to own this system, and you should used it as much as you can. And this system is really reliable, once you get past some getting used to. One more note, Now I do own several different system including Hasselblad Medium format. Medium Format Digital System is superior system when you are working in the control lighting environment. However, it is rather difficult to work with in the outside activity. If you are studio photographer with magazine or commercial client, and do occasional out side shoot, you should own both medium format and this camera. If you are professional just wondering about medium format and full size sensor camera,but without pressing need, then do not bother with medium format. People who uses medium format digital normally has pressing reason such as satisfying client's specifications to own such system. And it is not really versatile system no matter how medium format camera maker and digital back manufacture portray. Canon 1DS MK3 is really versatile system, and it will satisfy most of design agency, publisher or stock photo agency's requirement, and L lens system are reasonably priced for the performance when looking at the economics. For Semi Pro or High Amateurs User For semi professional. 1DS MK3 is not going to make best economic argument, if you do not shoot studio. If you are part time photographer who shoots mainly events or doing photo journalism. I will recommend 1DMK3 over 1DSMK3. Also, for photo journalist purpose, nowadays 5D MK2 actually makes a lot more sense than getting 1DS MK3 due to the their HD capability. And for the photo journalist, it is not that good idea to carry bulky system. But, for an amateur user with a lot of spending money, It is one of the best system to get taste of what real pro are using. And it does not cost like price of new BMW, and for the financially resourceful amateur, 7 to 8 grand may not be much of money. When I got 1DS MK3 there were several amateur photographer I taught how to use this camera... Surprising thing is, there are quiet many of amateur owner, and with very limited instruction to them, They were able to create very good quality images. So, kudos to the Canon for new 1DS MK3 interface. It is actually easier for 1DS first timer than older 1DS MK2 for instance. Of course, people who were used to with 1DS MK2 or older tend to disagree on this. Now here are list of main advantage. 1. It is 21.1MP, more than most of commercial assignment requires. 2. Color depth of 14bit per channel is really useful for RAW work flow process. 3. Economical compared to the expensive medium format system, and still get comparable or sometimes superior result if conditions are right. 4. Build like tank, and it can take a quiet bit of abuse. 5. For user who are used to with 20D~50D, 5D MK1~MK2, it is really easy to learn interface. 6. Dust cleaning is really useful. 7. AF + Canon L Lens combinations is superior to the other known system in the market as of 2008-9 8. Liveview is useful to shoot architecture, land scape, and products. 9. RAW file format is supported well by the major commercial software. 10.CF slot and SDHC slot actually helps. It did not occurred to me until I run out of memory card on the locations, and had to run to the nearby local drug store. At least they carry cheap SD/SDHC at any large drug store chains, and it is a lot easier to find those store than locating nearby large electronic store... 11. Battery Life is excellent, it will easily cover half day events with nearly a thousand of picture even with taxing RAW + JPEG shoot. 12. Due to its weight and form factor, it is a lot easier to balance with long heavy lens. 13. When used with L lens, it is somewhat comparable with expensive medium format digital back. 14. Silent shutter mode is somewhat useful. Now here are list of disadvantage. 1. It is slightly new form factor for Canon, and there are chance you had to send it to the warranty repair if you got the earlier production model. 2.There are something wrong with design of wireless port cap. It is relatively easy to lose one since it sometimes fell off with limited torque applied. I lost several of them already... though I stocked half dozen cap after I lost my first cap. 3. It is heavy and bulky. Thus some times not a ideal for certain situations. 4. Compared to Nikon D3X, it has slightly poor SNR on the third party software RAW processing software, so certain journalistic style shoot might suffer. If you shoot in the studio controlled lighting environment, that should not be a much of issue. 5. Many of RAW development software is actually more well tuned for Nikon, This might to be due to the amount of info Canon release to the third party software developer. 6. It is hard to justify its price for the many of users. 7. However everyone else claimed, it still can not replace medium format digital camera. Lens resolution and clarity of images is not there yet. Of course, that is when looking at 1:1 images side by side. 8. Silent shutter mode is not that quiet compared to some of the most quiet camera in the market. So, application such as close quarter Jazz or Classical music shot are still off the table. Overall, I will recommend this camera to who, If you are photographer that shoot tons of weddings at high fee structure, you should get one. Otherwise, EOS 5D nowadays makes very attractive choice. If you are commercial photographer with clients and sufficient invest in Canon system, why are you waiting? If you are amateur with deep pockets, this is a camera to get, and impress your photography teacher! I will not recommend to someone, Trek photographer who need lighter weight gear or those wild life photographer needs of faster fps should consider other offering from Canon. Any journalistic style should consider 1D MK3 first unless you shoot tons of interview photo. Shooting for hobby or fine arts purpose should really consider 5D mk2 before taking financial plunge of 1DS MK3 If you think it is heavy for you, do not get it. It will be too heavy for you after few hours of holding camera.
-
Posted: Feb 21 2009
Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III 21.1MP Digital SLR Camera (Body Only) I am an advanced amateur and was using the 5D Mark I for the past 2.5 years. I loved the images but hated the focusing. In any kind of shot that involved focusing on a subject moving at walking speed, (or less) the 5D would fail to snap into focus. The second shot would never be in focus. In lower light situations (typical interior lighting, not candles), the 5D was even worse. Sometimes the focusing would force the lens to go to maximum close/distance as the 5D hunted for focus - even when the lens was basically in focus to start - this was guaranteed to miss the shot. The 1Ds, on the other hand, is great at focusing. Super fast, subjects snap into focus quickly, and focusing continues onto 2nd shots and more. And it will focus on lenses that are 5.6 and above - something the 5D did not do (try a telephoto with a filter or extender). From what I can read, the new 5D Mark II has basically the same focusing system so it is not improved in this area. What kind of shots am I talking about? Shots of people,kids, basketball, soccer, bands, parades, candids on the street, street life, travel, animals in the wild or at home - I would include most everything except still life/landscape photos. Generally any shot you would not be making with a tripod is a situation where the 1Ds' focusing is vastly superior to the 5D. High resolution is great. But out of focus shots are not keepers. Finally, the 1Ds Mark III is much more solid than the 5D - everything from the controls to the shutter sound. I love this camera. My only wish is that it were the same size as the 5D since most shoulde camera bags don't account for its height. I don't mind the weight since the the weight of the lenses I am carrying is much heavier than the camera.
